Data

General Issues
Science & Technology
Health
Specific Topics
Artificial Intelligence
Health Care Reform
Location
Australia
Scope of Influence
National
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of private organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Involve
Total Number of Participants
30
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Mixed
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Jury
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Expert Presentations
Video Presentations
Primary Organizer/Manager
Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Funder
Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values
Type of Funder
Non-Governmental Organization
Staff
Yes

CASE

Artificial Intelligence in Australian Healthcare

August 13, 2024 friedel.marquardt
General Issues
Science & Technology
Health
Specific Topics
Artificial Intelligence
Health Care Reform
Location
Australia
Scope of Influence
National
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of private organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Involve
Total Number of Participants
30
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Mixed
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Citizens' Jury
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Both
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Expert Presentations
Video Presentations
Primary Organizer/Manager
Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values
Type of Organizer/Manager
Non-Governmental Organization
Funder
Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values
Type of Funder
Non-Governmental Organization
Staff
Yes

A national citizens’ jury was set up to hear from citizens about the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare.

Problems and Purpose

Participants were asked to deliberate in response to the question “Under which circumstances, if any, should artificial intelligence be used in Australian health systems to detect or diagnose disease?” [1] 

Background History and Context

With the development and advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), it has found its way into many areas of life. This offers opportunities as well as concerns. In areas such as healthcare, there are potential opportunities for greater accuracy in diagnoses and treatment, but this needs to be considered within the parameters of how the technology should be governed. While AI in healthcare is already being used in Australia, it needs further consideration. [2]  

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

The Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values (ACHEEV) commissioned and ran the citizens’ jury. The Sortition Foundation recruited participants. 

Participant Recruitment and Selection

30 participants, recruited through random stratified sampling, took part in the citizens’ jury. 

Participants received a stipend for taking part and had their travel, accommodation and meals for the in-person meeting provided by the organisers. [3] 

Methods and Tools Used

Citizens’ jury 

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

The process was 18 days in total; 15 online and three in-person in Sydney. The organisers also provided support and training for participants to be able to take part meaningfully. [4] 

Participants received information through a handbook, online documents, and four expert presentation recordings. Participants were also given the opportunity to ask questions of the experts on the first online day of the in-person deliberations and throughout the online deliberations. [5] 

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Participants distilled their deliberations down to 10 issues and 15 recommendations. The main priority recommendation was an “overarching, independently governing charter and framework” for using AI in healthcare. [6] 

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

[1] Carter, S. M., Aquino, Y. S. J., Carolan, L., Frost, E., Degeling, C., Rogers, W. A., Scott, I. A., Bell, K. J. L., Fabrianesi, B., & Magrabi, F., (2024) How should artificial intelligence be used in Australian health care? Recommendations from a citzens’ jury, Medical Journal of Australia, 220(8), 389-437, https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52283  

[2] Mayhew, K., (2024, May 28) AI will transform Australian healthcare. What should we do to get ready?, The Stand, University of Wollongong, https://www.uow.edu.au/the-stand/2024/ai-will-transform-australian-healthcare-what-should-we-do-to-get-ready.php  

[3] Carter, S. M., Aquino, Y. S. J., Carolan, L., Frost, E., Degeling, C., Rogers, W. A., Scott, I. A., Bell, K. J. L., Fabrianesi, B., & Magrabi, F., (2024) How should artificial intelligence be used in Australian health care? Recommendations from a citzens’ jury, Medical Journal of Australia, 220(8), 389-437, https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.52283  

[4] Ibid. 

[5] Ibid. 

[6] Ibid. 

External Links

Notes