Data

General Issues
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Transportation Planning
Infrastructure
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Toronto
Canada
Scope of Influence
Neighbourhood
Links
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3myv8c0njtis20y/22.MX.pdf?dl=1
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
36
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Mixed
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
Targeted Demographics
Experts
Stakeholder Organizations
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
Planning
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Recruit or select participants
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Q&A Session
Citizens' Reference Panel
Civic Lottery
Sortition
Roundtable Discussion
Collaborative Planning
Creative Planning
Mapping
Collaborative Design
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Participant Presentations
Site Visits
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
Idea Generation
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Government-Owned Corporation
Local Government
For-Profit Business
Type of Funder
Government-Owned Corporation
Staff
Yes
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in public policy
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Appointed Public Servants

CASE

Metrolinx Residents’ Reference Panel on the Davenport Community Rail Overpass

August 4, 2020 Joyce Chen
November 13, 2019 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
October 10, 2019 Scott Fletcher Bowlsby
April 29, 2019 alexandralava
January 2, 2017 alexandralava
October 3, 2016 alexandralava
General Issues
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Transportation Planning
Infrastructure
Collections
OECD Project on Representative Deliberative Processes
Location
Toronto
Canada
Scope of Influence
Neighbourhood
Links
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3myv8c0njtis20y/22.MX.pdf?dl=1
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
36
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Mixed
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
Targeted Demographics
Experts
Stakeholder Organizations
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
Planning
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Recruit or select participants
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Q&A Session
Citizens' Reference Panel
Civic Lottery
Sortition
Roundtable Discussion
Collaborative Planning
Creative Planning
Mapping
Collaborative Design
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Professional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Participant Presentations
Site Visits
Decision Methods
General Agreement/Consensus
Idea Generation
Communication of Insights & Outcomes
Public Report
Type of Organizer/Manager
Government-Owned Corporation
Local Government
For-Profit Business
Type of Funder
Government-Owned Corporation
Staff
Yes
Evidence of Impact
Yes
Types of Change
Changes in public policy
Changes in people’s knowledge, attitudes, and behavior
Implementers of Change
Appointed Public Servants

Metrolinx commissioned MASS to assemble a 36-resident reference panel who deliberated over a series of meetings on recommendations to help inform the design and delivery of the Davenport Community Rail Overpass project.

Problems and Purpose 

The Citizens' Reference Panel "was tasked with learning about transportation planning and processes, weighing design options and approaches, and proposing a set of values, priorities, and detailed recommendations" on a rail overpass in the Toronto community of Davenport. [1]

Background History and Context 

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities 

Participant Recruitment and Selection 

Methods and Tools Used 

This case is an example of a Citizens' Reference Panel, which refers to "a non-compulsory public jury used in Canada to provide policy advice to public and elected officials. They are generally convened by the government or a public agency and typically meet several times over a period of weeks or months to learn about, discuss, and reach agreement (or alignment) on a contentious public issue."[2] 

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects 

Analysis and Lessons Learned 

See Also 

Citizens' Reference Panel 

MASS LBP

Metrolinx Regional Residents’ Reference Panel on Transportation Investment 

References 

[1] Reference Panels. MASS LBP. Accessed April 28, 2019, https://www.masslbp.com/refpanels 

[2] https://participedia.xyz/method/635 

External Links 

Recommendations from the Toronto Residents’ Reference Panel on the Davenport Community Rail Overpass

Metrolinx - Davenport Reference Panel

Blog from a participant: http://blog.digin.ca/2015/05/normal-0-false-false-false-en-ca-x-none.html 

https://transit.toronto.on.ca/archives/weblog/2016/01/15-davenport_.shtml 

Notes 

Lead Image: Metrolinx Residents’ Reference Panel on the Davenport Community Rail Overpass/MASS LBP http://tinyurl.com/y37hymzd