Data

General Issues
Environment
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Land Use
Collections
The POLITICIZE Project on Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe
Location
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
National
Links
The POLITICIZE Dataset of 105 Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe, 2000–2020
The POLITICIZE Project
Reflecting on participation in the Citizens’ Jury at the Scottish Parliament & the idea of expertise
Scottish Jury on Land Use Management
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
22
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Civic Lottery
Sortition
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government

CASE

Scottish Jury on Land Use Management

April 8, 2021 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
March 24, 2021 Joyce Chen
General Issues
Environment
Planning & Development
Specific Topics
Land Use
Collections
The POLITICIZE Project on Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe
Location
United Kingdom
Scope of Influence
National
Links
The POLITICIZE Dataset of 105 Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe, 2000–2020
The POLITICIZE Project
Reflecting on participation in the Citizens’ Jury at the Scottish Parliament & the idea of expertise
Scottish Jury on Land Use Management
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Develop the civic capacities of individuals, communities, and/or civil society organizations
Approach
Consultation
Spectrum of Public Participation
Consult
Total Number of Participants
22
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Limited to Only Some Groups or Individuals
Recruitment Method for Limited Subset of Population
Stratified Random Sample
General Types of Methods
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Recruit or select participants
Propose and/or develop policies, ideas, and recommendations
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberation
Civic Lottery
Sortition
Legality
Yes
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Expert Presentations
Type of Organizer/Manager
National Government

The Scottish Jury on Land Use Management gathered 22 citizens for 2 and a half days in the Scottish Parliament. The Jury's recommendations were to inform the work of the Scottish Parliament’s Environment, Climate Change, and Land Reform Committee.

Problems and Purpose

A group of 22 people from all over Scotland, randomly selected and stratified by gender, ‘background’ and age met for 2 ½ days in the Scottish parliament building to discuss how funding for land-use management could be structured to help improve Scotland’s natural environment. The participants were able to question six sets of invited ‘experts’ about different dimensions of this question before coming to a set of recommendations for the committee. The whole process was independently evaluated.

Background History and Context

This was the first time the Parliament has run an event of this kind.

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

The citizens of the jury were selected from an initial group of respondents to letters sent to three thousand randomly selected households across Scotland.

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

The recommendations are due to be passed on to the committee, but reporting hasn’t yet happened. In a 18th June meeting, Mark Russell said: ‘[t]his committee engaged with recent citizens jury work, which has been very positive—I am sure that it will report in due course.’ In a recent committee report, it stated “[a] report outlining the key findings will inform the Committee’s future work programme’.

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes

This entry is based on the POLITICIZE dataset. More information can be found at the following links:

  • Paulis, Emilien; Pilet, Jean-Benoit; Panel, Sophie; Vittori, Davide; Close, Caroline, 2020, "POLITICIZE Dataset", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/Z7X6GT, Harvard Dataverse, V1
  • Pilet J-B, Paulis E, Panel S.,Vitori D & Close C. 202X The POLITICIZE Dataset: an inventory of Deliberative Mini-Publics (DMPs) in Europe. European Political Science.