Data

General Issues
Governance & Political Institutions
Specific Topics
Judicial Reform
Regionalism
Constitutional Reform
Location
Myanmar (Burma)
Scope of Influence
National
Links
Deliberative Polling on Federalism in Myanmar: Report
Deliberative Democracy and Federal Constitutional Design and Building in Myanmar
Moderating polarised positions on questions of national identity and sovereignty: Deliberative surveys on federalism in Myanmar
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Research
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Research
Spectrum of Public Participation
Not applicable or not relevant
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All With Special Effort to Recruit Some Groups
Targeted Demographics
Stakeholder Organizations
Elected Public Officials
General Types of Methods
Research or experimental method
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Collect, analyse and/or solicit feedback
Inform, educate and/or raise awareness
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberative Polling®
Community-Based Participatory Research
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Trained, Nonprofessional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Opinion Survey

CASE

Deliberative Polling on Federalism in Myanmar

October 21, 2020 Jaskiran Gakhal, Participedia Team
September 20, 2019 Scott Fletcher Bowlsby
September 19, 2019 Scott Fletcher Bowlsby
General Issues
Governance & Political Institutions
Specific Topics
Judicial Reform
Regionalism
Constitutional Reform
Location
Myanmar (Burma)
Scope of Influence
National
Links
Deliberative Polling on Federalism in Myanmar: Report
Deliberative Democracy and Federal Constitutional Design and Building in Myanmar
Moderating polarised positions on questions of national identity and sovereignty: Deliberative surveys on federalism in Myanmar
Start Date
End Date
Ongoing
No
Time Limited or Repeated?
A single, defined period of time
Purpose/Goal
Research
Make, influence, or challenge decisions of government and public bodies
Approach
Research
Spectrum of Public Participation
Not applicable or not relevant
Open to All or Limited to Some?
Open to All With Special Effort to Recruit Some Groups
Targeted Demographics
Stakeholder Organizations
Elected Public Officials
General Types of Methods
Research or experimental method
Deliberative and dialogic process
General Types of Tools/Techniques
Facilitate dialogue, discussion, and/or deliberation
Collect, analyse and/or solicit feedback
Inform, educate and/or raise awareness
Specific Methods, Tools & Techniques
Deliberative Polling®
Community-Based Participatory Research
Legality
Yes
Facilitators
Yes
Facilitator Training
Trained, Nonprofessional Facilitators
Face-to-Face, Online, or Both
Face-to-Face
Types of Interaction Among Participants
Discussion, Dialogue, or Deliberation
Ask & Answer Questions
Information & Learning Resources
Written Briefing Materials
Decision Methods
Opinion Survey

A research experiment to demonstrate the viability of deliberation among diverse participants on the country’s federal arrangements. Five events based on the deliberative polling methodology, two with local elites and stakeholder organizations, and three with mostly laypersons.

Problems and Purpose

Background History and Context

Organizing, Supporting, and Funding Entities

Participant Recruitment and Selection

Methods and Tools Used

What Went On: Process, Interaction, and Participation

Influence, Outcomes, and Effects

Analysis and Lessons Learned

See Also

References

External Links

Notes